Nigel Stuart wrote:
I have been very loyal, but can no longer afford to wait around month, after month, after month. The last update many months ago being that the manual was being written. That's going to be some manual.
Nigel, in my opinion, you have raised some valid points that apply equally to several of us here on the forum.
Frankly, the "
Now we're completing the manual" story has worn rather thin after 5 months. While I can't claim to know all the inner workings of CC and its software development process, I can apply some logic:
1) Did the creation of
SCC Pro require a complete, from-the-ground rewrite of
SCC,
SCD or
SCD Pro? Highly unlikely.
2) Did the creation of
SCC Pro require that the documentation for all of the aforementioned programs to be rewritten, starting with a blank page? Highly unlikely.
Belying, perhaps, the extent to which the existing code and documentation has been modified in preparation for release, I believe that we will observe that the greatest proportion of the functionality of the programs remains the same as it was prior to the upgrade to "Pro". Therefore, it should follow that a significant portion of the documentation should also remain unchanged or be minimally modified. This suggests that documentation updates should have been ongoing contemporaneously with the development of the added and modified features. At the very least, the explanatory portions of the new functionality could have been drafted, leaving the fine detail to the phase that we're supposedly in now.
My personal
OPINION is that a late-discovered bug or inadequacy has surfaced and it has proven difficult to correct, despite the 'code freeze' announced in March.
I am sure it will be good, but I can no longer afford to wait around and I have lost all faith in coffee cup.
In my mind, it's not so much an issue of faith, as I don't place faith in software companies. But CC's credibility has taken a big hit, in my estimation.