If you are using a monitor with 1920 x 1080 resolution, I can not imagine having any problems with the rendering of the responsive site designer application. I guess that if you split the screen and tried to do two things at once you might have difficulties with getting everything in on the application rendering in half of the space. I always work with the full HD and have not had any problems with the application not rendering properly on the screen, in that I have been able to render and achieve all application functions without any concerns with hidden items or lack of pixel space to do any functions.
Personally that is one of the reasons why I prefer large monitor screens to smaller resolutions of the lap top computers. I have a laptop a 15 inch one with the 1300 some odd by 720 resolution and I have not tries to do any site design on it. I see how it could be restrictive in some cases. But then again this responsive is supposed to work on the smaller screens so the 15 inch lap top is large by comparison. I would venture to say that you can probably design sites with the 15 inch laptops without any problems. I try to make my site like 1000 pixels wide to leave room for other things on the width of the rendering. I would imagine that if you was working with the smaller resolutions with the smaller devices you probably would have to scroll the pg side ways to get to the hidden items.

No, I wasn't trying to be rude whatsoever. It's constructive criticism which is entirely necessary for anything or anyone to improve at something. CoffeeCup products are great on the whole, and that's why I've purchased virtually all of them.

But the issue I'm referring to affects/affected me on my 13" MacBook Pro screen and my 'dated' 2006 Sony TV (which is still HD by the way). You could argue that on my new Samsung 24" 1920x1080 screens (although I have to use 1366x768 for dual screens) it isn't much of an issue because you don't really have to design for a width that big.

I think CoffeeCup's UX practices are very good generally because they keep things simple and tidy. I'm sorry though, but in this instance, popping up a box telling the user that they must drag the window to the left so it's partially off the screen is a bit of a silly workaround.

Still, I'd like to see this issue resolved in due course.

It would be nice to use search and replace working within a project. As an example, I use a text menu. If I should change anything in my menu, I have to do so manually on each page in the project. (as far as I know, anyway)

The hole point using RSD must be not to make use of any other editors. Because when you use an editor on the HTML pages, everything has to be done again the next time you build pages from RSD. So the goal must be to do every change directly in RSD.

It would also be nice to copy more than one element and perhaps columns at the time from one page to another.

Hi Guys

Not sure if its been suggested or its currently possible (havent found it if it is) but it woud be great to be able to add tabindex values in a form

Jamie

We were just thinking the same thing.

Great minds thiknk alike

Precisely. In particular it would certainly be nice if the 'CSS (Read Only)' was made editable to make quick changes. Essentially I can see RSD having a fully integrated text editor built-in eventually. That way you have the WYSIWYG and code options to suit individual needs.

I would be nice to copy a element or column from one project to another.
Example, I have made a button menu. I can copy the entire menu from one page to another, but not to another project.

And that would be nice.

I would like to see a printable report which lists all the elements on each page of the project, especially text and paragraph elements. This would help greatly in determining which elements can be re-used elsewhere. If element attributes were included, that would even be better.

hello
in the HTML editor, the following.

http://www.coffeecup.com/help/articles/implementing-structured-data/

Is it possible to make this also in RSD