Post your new ideas here! - Page 12

User 562592 Photo


Registered User
2,038 posts

Louis Guglielmino wrote:
I love CoffeeCup software! I use a lot of the programs except the HTML editor. My suggestion is to make the editor more robust by adding CSS, PHP. and JavaScript functions. I use Karlis Blumentals Rapid PHP editor. Maybe even go a step further and include some basic SQL query's. Take a look at it and tell me if CC is thinking about putting something like that together.


I think it is pretty robust. It does have CSS functions, and allows php editing. I dont think you would ever see sql stuff though.
The philosopher has not done philosophy until he has acted upon the mere conviction of his idea; for proof of the theory is in the act, not the idea.

My Web Development Company: http://www.innovatewebdevelopment.com (Created with Coffee Cup Software).

My Personal Website: http://www.EricSEnglish.com

User 36296 Photo


Registered User
36 posts

I have to say that a PHP editor (more robust) would really be great.

I agree with Louis I love CoffeeCup software. I use the editor and a few other products. The more I do the more I want to do with CoffeeCup.
"Doing what you like is Freedom!
Liking what you do is Happiness!"

http://www.3wayauctions.com/shop/
http://www.gyress.com
http://www.jjensen.com
User 100536 Photo


Registered User
2 posts

It's frustrating trying to check the various browsers for display. I have two browsers installed but especially with IE, the changes in code over the last few versions always leaves me wondering if my code will display properly. I really don't want to install a bunch of browsers on my machine for obvious reasons. Why don't you host say the top 15 browsers and have a test function like the HTML verify function so that we could upload a page in progress and check it's display in the most common browsers, IE 5-8, Firefox last three versions, Opera, etc? There are various web services such as browsershots.org which will test an already uploaded page, but I don't know how to test while in progress. The page could function like browsershots in that the user could choose which browsers he wants to test.

Maybe this would require too much in resources at your end, but perhaps you could alternatively automate such a test and pass it along to an internet service such as browsershots.org without requiring us to upload the files to a website.
User 562592 Photo


Registered User
2,038 posts

The html editor already has your two options. The test screen in the editor is IE, and you can set your favorite browser as mozilla. Then you have two top browsers you can go back and forth on.
The philosopher has not done philosophy until he has acted upon the mere conviction of his idea; for proof of the theory is in the act, not the idea.

My Web Development Company: http://www.innovatewebdevelopment.com (Created with Coffee Cup Software).

My Personal Website: http://www.EricSEnglish.com

User 3 Photo


Administrator
1,371 posts

Bruce,

The best thing to do is install the browsers you want to develop for. That way you're not depending on any service, you can preview pages locally, and you begin to learn the quirks of each browser. It's always best to view things with your own eyes.

Just fyi: I have Firefox 3.5, Firefox 2, Chrome, Safari, Opera, and Webkit installed on my OS X machine, then IE8, IE7, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari on my Vista and Windows 7 machines. Yes, it's a lot of browser testing, but that's the best way to make sure things work the way you want.

Note: I didn't list IE6 anywhere. ;)
User 562592 Photo


Registered User
2,038 posts

J is correct for true web development you have to have the browsers.
The philosopher has not done philosophy until he has acted upon the mere conviction of his idea; for proof of the theory is in the act, not the idea.

My Web Development Company: http://www.innovatewebdevelopment.com (Created with Coffee Cup Software).

My Personal Website: http://www.EricSEnglish.com

User 597929 Photo


Registered User
1,332 posts

http://browsershots.org/
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." -- Frank Zappa

Visit Spinland Studios: http://www.spinland.biz
User 237749 Photo


Registered User
1 post

Is there any hope for Mac users, or should I just move on? After asking for compatible software last May, I don't see much to change my impression that this is a dead issue.( And I don't want to install Windows on my Mac.)

Sad and still searching,

MC Bisharat
User 562592 Photo


Registered User
2,038 posts

Margaret C Bisharat wrote:
Is there any hope for Mac users, or should I just move on? After asking for compatible software last May, I don't see much to change my impression that this is a dead issue.( And I don't want to install Windows on my Mac.)

Sad and still searching,

MC Bisharat


Scott informed us at the beginning of the year that one of CC main focus for 2010 was mac compatibility. :D
The philosopher has not done philosophy until he has acted upon the mere conviction of his idea; for proof of the theory is in the act, not the idea.

My Web Development Company: http://www.innovatewebdevelopment.com (Created with Coffee Cup Software).

My Personal Website: http://www.EricSEnglish.com

User 3 Photo


Administrator
1,371 posts

Eric English wrote:
Margaret C Bisharat wrote:
Is there any hope for Mac users, or should I just move on? After asking for compatible software last May, I don't see much to change my impression that this is a dead issue.( And I don't want to install Windows on my Mac.)

Sad and still searching,

MC Bisharat


Scott informed us at the beginning of the year that one of CC main focus for 2010 was mac compatibility. :D


Yes. In fact it will be the primary focus of a large part of our development team once our next round of releases is complete. Expect to see Mac software late this summer. We're excited. :D

Have something to add? We’d love to hear it!
You must have an account to participate. Please Sign In Here, then join the conversation.